Go back in time

Show more

Flirt for ‘free’

 


Oh, hi. 
Welcome to a ton of dick. And I don't kid you when I say 'a ton', because Flirt for Free has a ton of naked men selling what you're buying. And the key word here is 'selling'. This post came to be because Jon wrote in his blog that when he called some men who work in sites just like Flirt for Free some bristled because he called them 'sex workers'. So let's see what a sex worker is, according to wiki:

sex worker is a person who provides sex work, either on a regular or occasional basis.[1] The term is used in reference to those who work in all areas of the sex industry.
@wikipedia

So the men who work at Flirt for Free would indeed be sex workers, right? If we take into account that they are selling sex (not intercourse, mind you) and that the nature of their work is sexual per se, they therefore be... sex workers. They are literally selling... sex. They purposefully arouse themselves and arouse those watching them with a view to a climax in exchange for... money. That's sex work. And I said as much in Jon's comment section:

Oh, they gave you an earful?
So they sell sex but are not 'sex workers'? The cognitive dissonance here causes whiplash. Maybe they don't have sex for money, but they sell the illusion of sex? Is it because most of the people tipping them are gay men and they're going the 'no homo' route?
Go ahead, invite them to post their thoughts here. For me, someone who sells sex, is by definition, a sex worker. Do they engage in sexual acts for money? That may be the difference they're making (some of those men masturbate, use prostate masaggers linked to the tokens, and are rewarded with money when they cum alone; but some do bring other men to have sex with them in front of the cams. For money.) and they may be able to explain that difference better. Are they conflating getting money from men and being gay? What is the deal??
Your point was not lost, BTW. You were clear and concise and very eloquent.
Yet I insist Donna Summer has been right all this time...

XOXO


Flirt for Free and the myriad sites that provide customers with an eyeful of dick and ass and pecs and abs certainly qualify as a place where people are selling... sexual titillation? The goal is literally make their viewers cum. Their bodies are the merchandise. 


You see, these beautiful men strip down to their briefs and then take them off for a token. A token that the men watching (because, let's be real, very few women go to these sites) first get for 'free' and then have to pay for. Because that's the hook (no pun intended): the first tokens are usually given to you, anything 'extra' you have to, well, buy with your credit card. Oh, yes. They accept Visa and MasterCard. Oh, one of the perks? Every time you give a model a token, there is a high probability that it will activate a buttplug he's wearing and that vibrates and gives the object of your lust the tingle to mingle. Ingenious, no? I would say Pavlovian, but that's just me. So you do have a motivation to buy more tokens. What if it is your token the magic one? It's like Willy Wonka, but with hard dicks. 


The difference between these sites and let's say, Chaturbate, is that in Chaturbate you usually do not pay. It's a 'free' site (even though there could be 'exchanges' between the watcher and the watched). In Flirt for Free and the such, the token is up and front when you log on. How do I know? Well, I signed up for it. Research, you know...

One thing that irks me is that a woman doing this would immediately be seen as a sex worker. No ifs or buts. But why not the men? What is it that makes people think that when a woman takes her clothes off and touches herself for money she's a whore but a man that does exactly the same (and we can see when he cums) is not? Oh, the lines we draw in the sand.



The men are usually on the 'young' side (if you think that men in their late twenties and early thirties are young, but hey, I don't know you...) and are more often than not, very athletic and very handsome. Kind of like Jon's Latin American 'friends'. And I'm sure that most of them have a day job and this is their side gig. Like working for GrubHub to pay for their Xbox. 


And the site itself is just as you imagined: a cornucopia of beautiful men ready to let you ogle them. And give them some tokens. 



Miles and miles of taut, naked flesh, sculpted abs, perky butts and hard dicks. From the guy next door to the god next gym. Yep. just like heaven.



Oh, and they are always on the lookout for new and fresh faces and bodies. And it seems that being a webcam 'model' definitely beats waiting tables:


So, let's recap: attractive men in a website undress, parade, masturbate and cum (usually with the help of buttplugs that are linked to the tokens you give) for other men who are watching them online in exchange for 'tokens'. Said tokens could be translated into somehow $1,000 per ten hours of work and sometimes the promise of $192,000 when working 40 hours per week.

It sounds like sex work to me? 
They've got what you want, you've got what they need. They'll be yours for the right amount of tokens. Maybe what these men do not like is that because they are getting money from gay/bi men who pay to watch them undress, masturbate and cum, they may somehow be considered gay/bi themselves? Is that it? Gay by Token? Is this a case of the No Homo?


 I think those hunks should rest assured that not even if they are indeed sucking dick and fucking some bouncy ass in Flirt for Free, they would not be allowed to still call themselves 'straight'. After all, Gay Porn is crawling with  gay for pay performers that once they stop taking ten inches up the ass run home to their wives/families and that's it. All in a day's work.

So what's your take, Constant Reader? Would being on sites like Flirt for Free make one of these men a sex worker? What is sex work, then? How do you define sex work? Would the cam girls int that site not be sex workers? Just good girls with a cam and a push up bra? Where do you draw the line? Was Donna Summer right?



I'll leave you with your thoughts, then. and if you wanna go take a look by yourself, feel Free: Flirt for Free is waiting for you...

XOXO


Comments

  1. If they're selling sex, they're sex workers. Donna Summer was a vocalist who sang about sex workers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I kinda agree with that.
      It just blows my mind that there's so much cognitive dissonance.
      And Donna sang about sex workers in Bed Girls. I watched a documentary about her on HBO. She was cool.

      XOXO

      Delete
  2. If sex workers sell, it means there are (a lot of) people buying. Otherwise they wouldn't be there!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely.
      There's always people more than willing to pay for sex.

      XOXO

      Delete
  3. Big says,
    If they are getting paid to do sexual activity, then, yes, they are sex workers. Ain't nothing wrong with that. In this age of cell phone cameras, anyone can be a porn star. Let them have their fun, let them make their money. It's not my thing --- to perform or pay to watch, but I sure don't have a problem with it. XOXO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, there's nothing wrong with it.
      The problem I see is the idea that there are categories of sex work? As some are MORE sex work than others?
      I think that not recognizing that they do sex work puts a stigma on sex work that should not be there.

      XOXO

      Delete
  4. Anonymous10/13/2023

    HuntleyBiGuy:
    I tend to agree. If they’re devoting time to this endeavor, and usually on a regular basis, and receiving payment in return, and basically offering their body for the sexual gratification of others, this is sex work. Nothing to be ashamed of. There may be a feeling on their part that “sex work” is something dirty that their mother wouldn’t approve. But they’re adults…own it.

    XOXO 👨🏼‍❤️‍💋‍👨🏽

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And the pay is not terrible, according to their own website.
      I think that they do think that sex wok is indeed dirty and that's why they renounce the name?? Silly people.

      XOXO

      Delete
  5. Making me feel old and very unattractive lol xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL
      Many of them are young, well-hung and full of cum. And they will charge for the privilege of letting someone enjoy that.
      Youth and attractiveness are a coveted currency, apparently.

      XOXO

      Delete
  6. I say they're providing a service that a great many people partake in and that's just fine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They are!
      It's not the fact that they don't have a clientele. It's that they say there's NO clientele when we can literally see the counter go up and up and up whenever they are online...

      XOXO

      Delete

Post a Comment

Go ahead, give it to me.

Translate

Followers

Popular Posts

En otra lengua

  • Sembrar sin miedo - [image: Todo sobre el cultivo de la amapola - Jardinatis] [image: Secuestran 41 plantas de marihuana en el barrio Lavalle de Viedma – Policía de Rio...
    6 hours ago
  • Los estudiantes - Me encontraba todavía en el periplo familiar de lado a lado del Atlántico cuando todo comenzó. Noticias e imágenes aterradoras llenaban las páginas de ...
    1 day ago
  • El amigo imaginario de mi madre. - Relato de Pablo Castignani Dicen que los niños suelen tener amigos imaginarios. Dicen también que algunos ancianos llegan a comportarse como niños....
    3 days ago
  • WE CAN'T BE FRIENDS - Ariana Grande me pilló a mi ya un poco... eso, grande (¿risas? ). Seguramente hace unos años se me hubiera hecho el trasero pesi-cola con ella y la notic...
    2 weeks ago
  • - En los días que se han convertido en años, en tiempo que transcurre y sin entenderme a mi mismo en mis angustias, en mis silencios, en mis ruidos que no c...
    4 years ago

Restricted to Adults

Restricted to Adults
Under 18? Beat it. Now.